Central Connecticut
Men - Women
2016 - 2017 - 2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
819  Austin Trainor JR 33:24
828  Alex Norstrom JR 33:25
1,202  Ryan Hertzog SR 33:55
1,480  Roberto Piotto SO 34:17
1,826  Charles Taubl FR 34:50
1,845  Jonathan Gill FR 34:52
2,105  Richard Grudzwick SO 35:20
2,460  Julio Arredondo SO 36:16
2,542  Kyle Welch JR 36:33
2,752  Adonys Langual JR 37:41
National Rank #189 of 315
Northeast Region Rank #28 of 42
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 26th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 9.4%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Austin Trainor Alex Norstrom Ryan Hertzog Roberto Piotto Charles Taubl Jonathan Gill Richard Grudzwick Julio Arredondo Kyle Welch Adonys Langual
Ted Owen Invitational 09/23 1324 33:23 33:29 35:52 36:18 38:01
Northeast Conference Championship 10/28 1157 33:13 33:40 33:41 33:41 34:30 34:20 35:04 36:19 36:47 37:24
Northeast Region Championships 11/10 1184 33:53 32:52 34:12 34:36 35:18 35:33 35:18





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 25.1 683 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.8 1.6 2.1 4.4 5.1 7.0 9.0 9.7 10.2 13.1 12.3 10.4 7.2 5.4 1.3



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Austin Trainor 88.3
Alex Norstrom 88.6
Ryan Hertzog 132.3
Roberto Piotto 164.4
Charles Taubl 202.6
Jonathan Gill 203.4
Richard Grudzwick 225.3




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 0.1% 0.1 14
15 0.1% 0.1 15
16 0.5% 0.5 16
17 0.8% 0.8 17
18 1.6% 1.6 18
19 2.1% 2.1 19
20 4.4% 4.4 20
21 5.1% 5.1 21
22 7.0% 7.0 22
23 9.0% 9.0 23
24 9.7% 9.7 24
25 10.2% 10.2 25
26 13.1% 13.1 26
27 12.3% 12.3 27
28 10.4% 10.4 28
29 7.2% 7.2 29
30 5.4% 5.4 30
31 1.3% 1.3 31
32 0.2% 0.2 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0